Meeting Sprint

Meeting 1, October 21:
Define the Target

Expected Output: Initial three-year outcomes for each Priority Team, including the scope of work, target populations, representation gaps, and follow-up assignments.

October 21st, 9am-11am; Memphis Teacher Residency

Meeting Brief

The October 21 meeting moved Read901 into substantive planning. Five groups reported working definitions, proposed three-year outcomes, and missing perspectives. The strongest result was a clearer picture of what each group wants to change and whose participation is needed. Outcomes, measures, and continuing responsibilities still need refinement before they can support investment recommendations.

Attendance

Leadership Memphis | Deaf Connect of the Mid-South | Teach for America | Memphis Public Libraries | First 8 Memphis | Porter-Leath | Memphis-Shelby County Schools | Urban Child Institute | All Children Excel | Governor’s Early Literacy Foundation | ARISE2Read | Stand for Children - TN | International Dyslexia Assoc. TN | Memphis Teacher Residency | University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center | LeBonheur | 2nd Presbyterian Church | Kifani Kids


Purpose and overall direction

The kickoff asked participants what meaningful success would look like in Shelby County three years from now. Groups were to define their scope, draft an outcome, identify missing voices, and establish a contact and next action.

It was the opening step in a five-meeting progression: define the target; understand the current system; determine what it takes; determine scale and resources; and recommend an investment portfolio. The intended destination is a set of investment briefs supporting locally developed literacy strategies.

In the closing discussion, Johnny emphasized that this work should help resource organizations already serving Memphis and Shelby County. Participants were encouraged to make personal introductions, copy Johnny, and hand off scheduling and follow-up to him. Johnny and Cardell also identified the need to refresh the organization inventory, beginning with partners’ focus areas and literacy services and eventually addressing funding and capacity.

What the groups developed

What remains unresolved

We did not address district Community Partnership Plans.

We have not established formal Anchor Partner appointments or completed outreach.

Across groups, proposed measures mix access, participation, service capacity, experience, and literacy outcomes. The next stage needs to clarify what each measure can demonstrate and what information partners can realistically supply.